Lads, since I do little to knowthing in work , I think I should use my time to gather any new news an up and coming game releases...if you have any comments about it let me know.

I’ve been told by two gaming media sources who asked to remain anonymous that Konami representatives had been asking print reviewers to keep some technical details out of their reviews, namely the length of the game’s cut-scenes and the size of the game’s installation on the PlayStation 3.
Such details wouldn’t have been plot spoilers, but perhaps the publisher was concerned that they would be viewed as negatives?
Konami representatives declined to comment to me about any of this, as did editors of a few major video game magazines.

So, no one wants to talk about it - but, as Totilo points out, here at Kotaku we've already seen box shots that suggest a 4.6 GB install for the game, and information suggesting the game has at least some very long cutscenes, possibly even 90-minute ones. Both bits of information seem to have spread like a virus all over the internet already, so if this is true, what would be the big hush on Konami's part?
My theory, for whatever it's worth, is the big I-word: Investors. These folks buy stock based on how they think a publisher's major releases will perform. Largely, these guys aren't gamers, but analysts (who do tend to play some games) offer them a basic checklist of positive and negative traits based on market sentiment.
An investor sees popular words like "sandbox," "open world," or "player choice," and can guess a game will perform well. An investor who sees words like "90-minute cutscenes," "large install" or other issues has been taught that these are things we, the game consumers, tend to get up in arms about, to the point where we leave 500 comments on a post about 90-minute cutscenes. And thus, the investor loses confidence in the title's financial forecast. Of course it's not that simple, but those who deal in finance would prefer to believe there is a fixed "formula" for success.
And my guess - just a guess, mind you - is that publishers are not particularly worried about Wall Street types reading Kotaku on a daily basis, but instead hope that when investors or analysts do a quick Metacritic scan, they don't see anything that could be construed as a red flag.

Lads I was going to post more news but, there is to much info on it so im gonna just leave the link


http://www.cracked.com/article_16330_5-innovative-ways-gaming-industry-screwing-you.html

If you are posting news from a website. Give a link to there site other wise we can get moaned at.

Check this legendary video out lads


http://www.cracked.com/video_16019_video-game-pitch-meeting-1979.html

Here lads im gonna create a MGC.net leaderboard, so can you post your gamertag and ill add you all.

I was on bungie.net looking at are fileshare screenshots and saw this result...mine is bad but look at micks

Yeah...first one to play Battlefield bad company and C&C kane's wrath....both are reall=ly good, and it shows that before games are released go into the shop and chance your arm

Here's loads of photo's from gears 23


http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=140016

Lads we should get a big game of bad company going tonight

None of us really got it, I think about 3 people on my entire friends list got it.

Yeah the same meself...but it is class...fast paced...adrenillan rushing kick ass game....the EA servers are shit thought

Connection issue for X360 players

6/27/2008
We are aware that some X360 players are having issues connecting to the Bad Company servers.

i just got battle Field today. watched the opening cut sceane then xbox froze.... I looked at it and was stareing at three blinking red lights...... Im buying the Elite.